|
PRESIDENT'S EMERGENCY PLAN
FOR AIDS RELIEF (PEPFAR)
Health GAP Report: Between
the Lines
GAO Report on
PEPFAR Prevention Programs: U.S. Abstinence/Being Faithful-Only
Programs Produce Stigma and Death
On April 4,
2006, the U.S. Government Accountability Office released a stinging
indictment of U.S. prevention policies that prioritize sexual
abstinence and being faithful to an HIV-negative partner over
scientifically proven methods of reducing the tide of infections.
Although the GAO Report on PEPFAR Prevention Programs documented the
negative consequences of rigid guidelines requiring that 1/3 of the
overall prevention budget (and 2/3 of the behavioral prevention budget)
must be spent on abstinence/being faithful (A/B-only) programming, it
failed to highlight the negative consequences of that ideologically
narrow focus on the lives of people living with HIV and their sexual
partners in terms of stigmatization and lost opportunities for risk
reduction.
Download PDF of the entire report
The President's
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) contains policies on prevention
driven by ideological motivations which completely ignore
scientifically proven methods. The Bush administration has tied PEPFAR
funding to strict requirements such as mandating that 33% of prevention
funds be spent on abstinence-until-marriage programs, limiting condom
distribution to narrowly-defined "high risk" groups, and demanding
grantees to explicitly condemn sex workers. These approaches all run
counter to the establishment and continuation of comprehensive
prevention programs which have demonstrated effectiveness in slowing
the spread of HIV.
The harmful
effects of Bush's PEPFAR prevention policies have most recently taken
shape in Uganda where comprehensive prevention efforts were credited
with dramatically reducing the HIV prevalence over the past decade.
Pressures of PEPFAR funding requirements have caused a notable shift in
the prevention approaches of the Ugandan government however as
President Museveni and other leaders have strongly endorsed
abstinence-only programs and increased anti-condom rhetoric over the
past year. Some 32 million quality-approved condoms remain impounded in
government warehouses while the U.S. government ramps up financing for
abstinence-only approaches to HIV prevention. According to Ugandan AIDS
activists, the government's actions will undermine community efforts to
reduce HIV prevalence and HIV transmission. These trends away from
scientifically sound, evidence-based prevention strategies are
occurring in Uganda and in other countries hard-hit by the AIDS
epidemic, such as Nigeria, South Africa, and Zambia.
THE CONDOM CRISIS IN UGANDA
AND PEPFAR's ABSTINENCE-ONLY HIV PREVENTION STRATEGIES

- RELEASE THE
CONDOMS, FUND EFFECTIVE PREVENTION STRATEGIES, SAVE LIVES NOW!
Community letter from individuals and organizations in and outside of
Uganda demanding action on part of the Ugandan government to support
comprehensive prevention programs, end abstinence-only programs, and
immediately take steps to distribute quality assured condoms in public
facilities.
Send a letter to MOH Jim Muhwezi
August 30,
2005 Experts and activists speak out against 10 month long condom
shortage in Uganda and the role of the Bush administration in deriding
the use and promotion of condoms to prevent HIV. CHANGE and Health GAP
release fact sheets and timelines regarding the Uganda condom crisis
and US policies supporting abstinence-only programs through the
President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).
- August 30,
2005 (Manhattan) A coalition of AIDS activists held a demonstration
in midtown Manhattan outside of the Ugandan Permanent Mission to the
United Nations today to bring attention to that nation's severe condom
shortage which is putting people at dangerous risk of HIV infection.
The crisis has developed over the past ten months as the government of
Uganda has stopped its robust program of public sector condom
distribution. These condoms previously accounted for 80% of condoms
available in the country.
- August 11,
2005 Letter from Health GAP, CHANGE, TAC, GMHC, Advocates for
Youth, and CHAMP, calling upon Peter Piot to mobilize mass-awareness of
the Ugandan condom crisis and its implications, and to urgently
mobilize resources as necessary to get quality-assured condoms
available to the public as well as to rebuild national trust in the
Engabu brand and/or quality assured condoms distributed by the
government.
Read Letter |
Download Word doc
MORE
INFORMATION
SEX WORKER
GAG RULE
U.S.
PROCUREMENT POLICIES AND THE EFFORT TO SHUT OUT GENERIC DRUGS AND
FIXED-DOSE COMBINATIONS (FDCS)
- January 26,
2005 (New York) The announcement that Aspen Pharmacare of South
Africa has received approval for co-packaged Lamivudine/Zidovudine and
Nevirapine through the FDA fast-track marketing approval process
represents a glimmer of progress in what still remains an unnecessary,
duplicative, costly, delayed, and ultimately flawed U.S. review
process.
- Aspen's
FDA Approval Weak Evidence of the Effectiveness of the FDA Expedited
Approval Process Statement
| Download
Word doc
- Statement of the Ecumenical Pharmaceutical
Network (EPN), , comprised of Christian Health Associations and
hospitals, non-profit drug supply organisations and church related
development agencies, from 22 countries, on the President's Emergency
Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Press
Statment| Download
Word doc
BACKGROUND
U.S.
Global AIDS Initiative (GAI) officials have been using several
misleading arguments in order to justify its lack of support for
permitting low cost, WHO pre-qualified generic medicines of assured
quality to be used in the Presidential Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
(PEPFAR) and other U.S.-funded AIDS projects. These misleading claims
include:
MYTH:
The WHO is not a regulatory body, so it is not qualified to identify
quality-approved manufacturers. Randall Tobias, in testimony before the
House Appropriation Committee's Foreign Operations Subcommittee, said:
"The problem is there is no process, no principles, no standards in
place today, from a regulatory point of view, to make" the assurance
that a product is quality assured.
FACT:
There are process, principles, and standards that guide WHO
pre-qualification. They are clear and transparent (see, for example,
http://mednet3.who.int/prequal/default.shtml, the website of the
Pre-qualification Project).
According
to the WHO, the data that generic companies seeking
pre-qualification must submit are, in essence, the same as the criteria
that the FDA requires from companies seeking FDA approval for their
multi-source (generic) drugs. This includes in vivo bioequivalence
studies that show generic companies are producing medicines that are
bioequivalent to proprietary medicines. Multi-country site assessment
teams are dispatched to inspect product manufacturing sites, and to
verify company compliance with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)
standards. WHO standards for GMP are the only globally accepted
standards for generic medicines.
MYTH:
The U.S. can't endorse the WHO pre qualification process because the
U.S. can't get access to the information in the product dossiers that
generic companies submit to the WHO. The U.S. can't be expected to take
WHO's word that the generic companies' data are acceptable—but they
can't evaluate the information themselves.
FACT:
U.S. officials could engage with the pre-qualification project and sign
confidentiality agreements that would permit them to have access to all
the data prepared by generic companies. Administration officials have
refused to take that step. If they got involved, then the U.S. would
have to concede that the pre-qualification project is sufficiently
rigorous. Instead they are using this non-issue to justify what is an
ideologically motivated position—one which allows them to continue
gunning for the purchase of overpriced, brand-name medicines.
HEALTH GAP STATEMENTS AND PAPERS
- Bilateral
Financing for ARV Treatment Programs: Promises, Pitfalls, and the Need
for Change, Sharonann Lynch, Realising the Right to
Health, Mumbai, India, 19 March 2005. Download
Slide presentation
- January 26, 2005
(New York) The announcement that Aspen Pharmacare of South Africa has
received approval for co-packaged Lamivudine/Zidovudine and Nevirapine
through the FDA fast-track marketing approval process represents a
glimmer of progress in what still remains an unnecessary, duplicative,
costly, delayed, and ultimately flawed U.S. review process.
- Aspen's
FDA Approval Weak Evidence of the Effectiveness of the FDA Expedited
Approval Process Statement
| Download
Word doc
- Statement of the Ecumenical Pharmaceutical
Network (EPN), , comprised of Christian Health Associations and
hospitals, non-profit drug supply organisations and church related
development agencies, from 22 countries, on the President's Emergency
Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) Press
Statment| Download
Word doc
- October 6, 2004
(Moshi) Health GAP Presentation: "PEPFAR: Promises, Pitfalls, and the
Need for Change," October 6, 2004.
Download Power Point
- September
21, 2004 (New York) Health GAP statement issued following President
George Bush's address to the United Nations.
Health GAP Media Statement
- July 13, 2004
(Bangkok) The non-partisan U.S. Congressional agency charged with
maintaining the accountability of government programs delivered a
simple message to President George Bush this week: the President's
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) is not delivering on its
promises.
Health GAP Press Release
- April 6, 2004
(Manhattan) Health GAP response to Clinton Foundation, GFATM, UNICEF,
and World Bank announcement of support for WHO prequalified generic
ARVs in face of Bush anti-generics PEPFAR policy.
Health GAP Press Release
- (March 29, 2004)
Carrying a banner reading "Bush and Pharma block generic AIDS drugs
while millions die." Eight AIDS activists are arrested for blocking
traffic in front of the offices of PhRMA, the U.S. drug company lobby
at during a demonstration demanding President Bush permit the
procurement of generics pre-qualified by WHO in the PEPFAR. Activists,
dressed as Bush, laid 50 "money bags" bags of money at the entrance of
PRHMA. Read
press release
- (March 26, 2004)
The Bush Administration faces mounting criticism from the domestic and
international community for blocking generic AIDS drugs in its
federally funded programs in poor countries. U.S. European Agency for
the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA), the largest drug
regulatory authority in the European Union, decides not to send any
representative to the Botswana meeting on FDCs, despite previous
involvement in planning; Read
press release | Download
press release | Download
Note to Editors
- March 26, 2004
(Manhattan) Health GAP note to editors with background information and
links to mounting proof against Bush administration's false claims
against quality, safety, and efficacy of WHO prequalified generics and
3 in one pills, or FDCs. Health
GAP Note to Editors
- New
barriers to accessing medicines: US attacks on WHO Prequalifcation of
fixed-dose combinationa ARV, and drug registration catch 22's,
Brook Baker, at Centre for the AIDS
Programme of Research in South Africa, March 26, 2004.
Download
Slide presentation
- (March 25, 2004)
Transcript of the journalist teleconference hosted by Health GAP and
Doctors Without Borders/Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF):
"Ignoring Lives To Protect Pharma Profit?: Bush Plan to Block Use of
Affordable, Effective, Quality Generic AIDS Medicines," March 25, 2004.
Read
Online | Download
transcript
- (March 22, 2004)
Health GAP Briefing Paper: "U.S. Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief
(PEPFAR): Facts and Critical Issues" Download
PDF
- (February 24,
2004) Health GAP briefing paper on U.S. guidelines for procurement by
Brook Baker Download
doc
|