Dear UNAIDS: Magical thinking on who will fund the AIDS response will not end the epidemic

[originally posted on]

On Saturday, April 2, UNAIDS released revised resource needs estimates that reflect important new analysis about what it will take to put the world on the “fast track” to ending the AIDS crisis by achieving the 90–90–90 treatment goals. UNAIDS calculates $26.2 billion is needed in low- and middle-income countries by 2020 in order for the world to reach a critical tipping point, after which the cost of the response will begin to fall. The 2020 funding gap is roughly $6 billion — about what Americans will spend on Independence Day celebrations this year or what US Presidential candidates will spend on ads this election cycle. This is an entirely achievable goal.

Ending the AIDS pandemic in our lifetimes requires politically-informed, human rights-based strategies to mobilize sufficient resources. The world needs $26 billion by 2020 in order to front-load the investment needed to end the AIDS crisis.
Read more

The Next President Has a Narrow Window to End Global AIDS: The Plan All Candidates Must Address

Tens of millions of people have died of AIDS-related causes since the beginning of the epidemic. As the most serious epidemic in living memory, AIDS has necessarily been a campaign platform in presidential races for the last 20 years. The US plays the most crucial role in funding the response to the global pandemic, and with current available treatments, the next president of the United States has a historic opportunity to be the one who ends the AIDS pandemic. And yet, until last weekend, not a single presidential candidate had an official strategy for the global AIDS response. 

Read more

Fighting Uganda’s Health Worker Crisis: A Recipe for Success

More than sixteen Ugandan women die every day of complications related to pregnancy and childbirth – complications that almost never kill women in wealthy countries. Uganda’s national shortage of professional health workers is a cross-cutting health crisis, directly contributing to maternal mortality, lack of access to HIV treatment, and more. 

Over the last two decades, while the country endured a catastrophic HIV epidemic, heartbreaking maternal mortality rates, and a range of other health crises, the Ugandan government did not prioritize health funding in spite of steady economic growth.

Read more

Omnibus spending bill passes but fails to restore $300 M to PEPFAR

The omnibus appropriations passed this morning in a vote of 310 to 112, and the FY 16 budget bill is sure to be signed by the President.  Health GAP and our fellow global AIDS activists are very disappointed that the mega spending bill fails to restore the $300 million in funding cuts that PEPFAR, the U.S.-funded global AIDS program, has seen since 2011. Instead, funding for global AIDS treatment and prevention remained level to FY 2015 at $4.32 billion for the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), and $1.35 billion for the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria.

This is a pivotal moment in the history of the most devastating epidemic in modern history. We have the opportunity to end the HIV pandemic in the coming decade, but without enough funding for treatment and prevention, President Obama and Congress are betraying their promise to end AIDS. 

Read more

TPP = Transnational Pharmaceutical Profiteering

Big Pharma’s Monopolies Strengthen and Multiply in
Trans Pacific Partnership Trade Agreement

After five years of secret negotiations directed and controlled by pharmaceutical lobbyists and drug-company-dominated trade advisory groups, the official text of the Trans Pacific Partnership negotiated by the Obama administration has been released.  The text confirms critics’ worst fears – pharmaceutical behemoths like Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Merck, Glaxo-Smith Kline, and Abbot Laboratories have gained expanded monopoly protections and greatly enhanced enforcement rights.  Patients, both domestically and abroad, will suffer delayed access to more affordable medicines and biologics.  In the U.S., resulting prices increases will lead to even more rationing and burgeoning out-of-pocket payments.  In low- and middle-income TPP partners, excessive prices that neither patients nor governments can afford can and will result in death.

In the mind-numbing blur of thousands of pages, killer text can be found.  There are express mandates requiring patent term extensions beyond the twenty years required by international law.  There are mandatory monopolies on new uses of known medicines and provisions that make it easier to get secondary patents that are only weakly inventive and that also lengthen patent monopolies.  There are additional monopolies on the regulatory data submitted by Big Pharma on small molecule medicines, monopolies blocking generic competition that start at five years but can be extended for successive three-year periods.  And there are new monopolies on biologic regulatory data that effectively forestall the marketing of biosimilars for at least eight years.

To guard against the risk of price controls and non-listing of their newest high-priced medicines, the drug companies have also gained privileged access to government bodies that make decisions on product listing and reimbursement rates.  The pharma-fox is in the cost-cutting hen house.

Ever attentive to the details of profiteering, Big Pharma and Big Bio have also expanded their repertoire of enforcement rights.  Mandatory injunctions, expanded damages, and enhanced border measures will be required.  Even more dangerously, biopharmaceutical monopolists have now gained unprecedented powers in the DTPP’s Investment Chapter to directly sue governments when their expectations of monopoly profits are thwarted by a government’s patent, data-related, and pricing decisions and rules.

Drug companies are hiding their glee at new monopoly rights by complaining that they didn’t get everything they wanted, especially 12-years of monopoly protection on biologic regulatory data.  Every time Big Pharma fails to get every last drop of blood money it wants, it complains that its future research and development projects will wither and die.  This is an industry that is consistently one of the top three most profitable in the world.  Company valuation and annual sales each exceed a trillion dollars.  One out of every five health care dollars in rich countries is spent on medicines and annual price escalation of medicines is consistently many multiples of inflation rates.  And in developing country TPP partners like Vietnam, Peru, Chile, Mexico, and Malaysia, government health budgets will be strained and people living with preventable, treatable, and curable illnesses will do without.  People living with HIV, hepatitis c, and other diseases will simply not have affordable access to newer medicines embargoed by the TPP’s monopoly protections.

The Obama administration has claimed that the TPP represents a new gold standard trade agreement – a trade agreement for the 21st century and for all countries.  The TPP is a gold standard ... for the hugely profitable and profiteering pharmaceutical industry.  But it is a budget buster for governments, insurers, and patients and a disaster for the right to health domestically and abroad. 

Many forces are lining up against the TPP in the U.S., including Members of Congress.  Trade, environmental, labor, internet-freedom, health, and other constituencies are trying to get their voices heard.  Fortunately, the TPP is not yet a done deal, despite its past secrecy and Fast Track legislation that will limit Congressional debate and amendatory authority.  Once again AIDS activists know that “pills cost pennies, but greed costs lives.”  It’s time to act-up again.

Donate Stay Connected


get updates