The UN Secretary General should be ashamed.

On UMICs United Nations Secretary General should be ashamed... 

The current UNSG’s report includes a table that calls for a dramatic pullout of international funding from upper-middle income countries (p17/31). As I wrote here, it also includes ridiculous estimates that low- and lower-middle income countries will increase their funding by 400-500%.

Read more

Nothing About Us Without Us: How activists can claim their role in PEPFAR decision-making

Kenya has the fourth highest HIV burden in the world - and international donors currently fund 70% of the AIDS response in the country. The majority of this donor funding is from the U.S. funded President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which provides $500 million USD a year.  As the largest funder, PEPFAR plays a key role in the HIV response in our country - as it does throughout most of Sub-Saharan Africa.  It is crucial that the voices of activists are heard by PEPFAR when they decide how funding is used.

Read more

Presidential Candidates: Don't Pull the Wool Over Our Eyes on HIV Funding

Clinton___Sanders_final.jpgWith the New York Primaries happening today, both Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton have been campaigning all over the state— and both have disappointed AIDS activists. Neither candidate could find time to schedule a meeting with us, as requested months ago, before the April 19th vote.

Last week, a coalition of AIDS activists - including Health GAP - pressured both campaigns to stop ignoring people living with HIV and their allies and meet with us. To their credit, these meetings have been now been scheduled - but not until May, well after the New York primary is over.

Read more

Dear UNAIDS: Magical thinking on who will fund the AIDS response will not end the epidemic

[originally posted on Medium.com]

On Saturday, April 2, UNAIDS released revised resource needs estimates that reflect important new analysis about what it will take to put the world on the “fast track” to ending the AIDS crisis by achieving the 90–90–90 treatment goals. UNAIDS calculates $26.2 billion is needed in low- and middle-income countries by 2020 in order for the world to reach a critical tipping point, after which the cost of the response will begin to fall. The 2020 funding gap is roughly $6 billion — about what Americans will spend on Independence Day celebrations this year or what US Presidential candidates will spend on ads this election cycle. This is an entirely achievable goal.

Ending the AIDS pandemic in our lifetimes requires politically-informed, human rights-based strategies to mobilize sufficient resources. The world needs $26 billion by 2020 in order to front-load the investment needed to end the AIDS crisis.
Read more

The Next President Has a Narrow Window to End Global AIDS: The Plan All Candidates Must Address

Tens of millions of people have died of AIDS-related causes since the beginning of the epidemic. As the most serious epidemic in living memory, AIDS has necessarily been a campaign platform in presidential races for the last 20 years. The US plays the most crucial role in funding the response to the global pandemic, and with current available treatments, the next president of the United States has a historic opportunity to be the one who ends the AIDS pandemic. And yet, until last weekend, not a single presidential candidate had an official strategy for the global AIDS response. 

Read more


Donate Stay Connected

connect

get updates