Heading back to my home-base in Uganda after last week’s International Conference on AIDS and STIs in Africa (ICASA) held in Côte d’Ivoire, I was on a flight full of Ugandan politicians, activists, and researchers--and we were left shaking our heads. ICASA 2017 felt like a shambolic anachronism—a conference that tried to foreclose the rightful space of civil society to speak out and fight back.
I had traveled to Abidjan to join forces with other activists from across the continent to challenge policymakers, discuss the latest progress in science, and demand aggressive scale up of treatment, prevention and human rights. Particularly for West and Central African countries, where only 35% of all people living with HIV are on treatment, compared to 60% of all people with HIV in East and Southern Africa, this ICASA could have been a moment to focus on the urgent need for political courage in the fight against AIDS in a region that is chronically left behind because of gross underfunding, human rights violations targeting criminalized populations, and lack of prioritization by political leaders from around the world. Instead ICASA 2017 served to further reinforce just how far we have to go in the fight to end AIDS.Read more
Expanding Access to Life-Saving Medicines: What Government Must Do Next to Continue Reforming Drug Patents in South Africa
Late last month, Health GAP's Senior Policy Analyst Professor Brook K. Baker made a submission with Yousuf Vawda to the government of South Africa calling for steps the government must take in order to implement its Draft Intellectual Property Strategy 2017 and reform how patents on medicines are granted in South Africa. These proposed changes from the government came about after targeted activist pressure from the Fix the Patent Laws campaign, led by Treatment Action Campaign, Médecins Sans Frontières, and other AIDS activists. Read the full submission here.
In a stunning reversal of policy, on June 30, 2017, the Supreme Court of Canada overturned decades of precedent making it easier for the biopharmaceutical industry to gain patents on medicines without any real proof of a claim that a putative invention has any meaningful utility. This reversal in AstraZeneca Canada Inc. v. Apotex, Inc. is particularly disconcerting because Canada had just won an investor-state arbitration award in the long awaited Eli Lilly v. Canada case upholding its more stringent promise/utility doctrine that had been used successfully to overturn two dozen secondary patents, particularly those claiming new uses of known medicines, where patent claimants failed to present evidence in support of the prediction of therapeutic benefit promised in their patent applications.Read more
Trump’s Draft Executive Order on Pharmaceutical Pricing: Dangerous Medicine for Consumers at Home and Abroad
BY: Professor Brook K. Baker, Northeastern U. School of Law, Health GAP Senior Policy Analyst
A draft of President Trump’s Executive Order (EO) on “Reducing the Costs of Medical Products and Enhancing American Biomedical Innovation” has been leaked, and the text provides a concerning first look at the administration’s dangerous medicine for consumers at home and abroad. As expected, the leaked text places significant blame for high US prices, not on the monopolies enjoyed by biopharmaceutical companies, but on foreign countries that “pay too little” for medicines and that “devalue American innovation,” for example by utilizing price controls or refusing to list for reimbursement drugs that are priced in excess of their therapeutic value. There is no evidence that these policy moves by foreign countries are responsible for high drug prices in the US.Read more